Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy

At ProjectCat.org, our editorial vision is grounded in transparency, science-based knowledge, and ethical storytelling. We are committed to producing content that educates, inspires, and mobilizes public awareness around wild cat conservation and the protection of endangered ecosystems.

This Editorial Policy outlines how we create, manage, and moderate the content published on our website.

  1. Mission-Driven Content All editorial decisions are guided by our mission to:

Promote the conservation of wild cat species and their natural habitats

Support ethical, science-backed environmental advocacy

Amplify the voices of field researchers, conservationists, and local communities

Encourage responsible public engagement with wildlife issues

  1. Content Sources and Contributors ProjectCat.org’s content is developed through:

In-house writers and editors with a background in environmental science or journalism

Verified conservationists, researchers, and partner NGOs

Volunteers or guest contributors submitting educational or personal experience pieces

All contributors are required to submit only factual, non-plagiarized content that aligns with our values.

  1. Accuracy and Review We fact-check all core data, species information, and policy-related claims using the most recent and reliable sources, including:

Peer-reviewed journals

Reports from international conservation bodies (e.g., IUCN, CITES)

Firsthand data from field partners and wildlife experts

Each article undergoes a multi-stage editorial review to ensure clarity, integrity, and scientific accuracy.

  1. User-Submitted Content We welcome community engagement through submitted articles, photographs, and wildlife stories. All user content is reviewed and may be edited for:

Grammar and readability

Accuracy of any stated facts or claims

Ethical compliance with wildlife representation

Submissions must not include distressing or graphic images of animals unless essential for educational purposes and clearly labeled with content warnings.

  1. Correction Policy If any published content is found to contain factual inaccuracies, outdated data, or ethical concerns:

A correction notice will be added to the article

Content may be updated, retracted, or clarified as appropriate

We encourage readers to report errors via our Contact page

  1. Editorial Independence ProjectCat.org maintains editorial independence and does not accept payment or influence from sponsors, corporations, or political bodies in exchange for editorial coverage. Any sponsored content or partnerships will be clearly labeled as such.

  2. Representation of Wildlife and Communities We are committed to:

Depicting wild animals with respect and accuracy

Avoiding sensationalism, exploitation, or anthropomorphism

Highlighting indigenous and local voices in conservation narratives

Giving proper credit to all photos, data, and media sources

  1. Respectful Language and Ethics We avoid publishing:

Misinformation or unverified claims

Language that promotes fear, hate, or violence toward species or people

Politically charged content unrelated to wildlife protection

We aim to foster hope-driven, constructive conversations about conservation.

  1. Feedback and Participation Readers are welcome to share their thoughts, corrections, or pitch ideas through our Contact page. We believe collaborative dialogue enriches our mission.

📬 Submit your story or inquiry: ProjectCat.org/contact